Comments for Adventures in Mormonism

Comment on About Bruce F. Webster by Deep religion and deep logic | Adventures in Mormonism

Deep religion and deep logic | Adventures in Mormonism — Sat, 23 Mar 2013 19:03:37 +0000

[...] About Bruce F. Webster [...]

Comment on Joseph Smith’s Presidential platform by A Mormon Running for Office?! | followingmypathatplts

A Mormon Running for Office?! | followingmypathatplts — Wed, 31 Oct 2012 02:21:47 +0000

[...] http://adventures-in-mormonism.com/2007/12/19/joseph-smiths-presidential-platform/ [...]

Comment on Mormons and the Vietnam-Era Draft by Mormons, Vietnam, Romney and the Draft, revisited | Adventures in Mormonism

Mormons, Vietnam, Romney and the Draft, revisited | Adventures in Mormonism — Sun, 21 Oct 2012 04:06:29 +0000

[...] years ago, the Boston Globe ran an article suggesting collusion between the LDS Church and the US Selective Ser… The simple truth was, yes, young men could get a ministerial deferment (one of many different [...]

Comment on Billy Graham breaks with a 30-year policy and appears to endorse Mitt Romney by GayPatriot » Billy Graham backs Mitt Romney

GayPatriot » Billy Graham backs Mitt Romney — Fri, 12 Oct 2012 14:18:32 +0000

[...] President Obama.” Many, including Bill Clinton, have sought Graham’s counsel, but, as Bruce Webster reminds us, “Graham has had a policy in place of not endorsing presidential candidates (cf. this 1980 [...]

Comment on A simple step for Obama by Go big or go home

Go big or go home — Tue, 02 Oct 2012 22:40:29 +0000

[...] GOP candidates were so much worse (IMHO). And even though I didn’t vote for Obama in 2008, I had hopes for him. He has turned out to be (again, IMHO) a [...]

Comment on New light on Book of Mormon origins! by Sun Tzu and the Book of Mormon | Adventures in Mormonism

Sun Tzu and the Book of Mormon | Adventures in Mormonism — Thu, 20 Sep 2012 20:49:32 +0000

[...] the Book of Mormon — though that would be an interesting post as a follow-up to my one about Alexander the Great, and I may well write it. Instead, I’m talking about [...]

Comment on Who gets saved? by Clinton (Bill) plays the anti-Mormon card | Adventures in Mormonism

Clinton (Bill) plays the anti-Mormon card | Adventures in Mormonism — Wed, 12 Sep 2012 14:45:29 +0000

[...] is false. Unlike much of Christianity, LDS doctrine is nearly Universalist as to who gets saved. As I wrote five years ago on this site when Gary South at Politico tried to play the same card: This posting — indeed, my starting this entire blog [Adventures in Mormonism] — is prompted by [...]

Comment on Mormons and Hell by And so it begins: Obama (via Clinton) plays the anti-Mormon card

And so it begins: Obama (via Clinton) plays the anti-Mormon card — Wed, 12 Sep 2012 12:42:49 +0000

[...] no actual fire and brimstone and (with a very few exceptions) only of limited duration — here is this post as well. ..bruce [...]

Comment on Who gets saved? by And so it begins: Obama (via Clinton) plays the anti-Mormon card

And so it begins: Obama (via Clinton) plays the anti-Mormon card — Wed, 12 Sep 2012 12:38:50 +0000

[...] is false. Unlike most of the rest of Christianity, LDS doctrine is vastly more inclusive. As I wrote five years ago when Gary South at Politico tried to play the same card: This posting — indeed, my starting this entire blog [Adventures in Mormonism] — is prompted by [...]

Comment on A few thoughts on “Anti-Nephi-Lehi” by BMGD #26 Alma 23-29 | Times & Seasons

BMGD #26 Alma 23-29 | Times & Seasons — Mon, 02 Jul 2012 13:01:24 +0000

[...] suggests here that ANL might mean “the men of Nephi and Lehi.” More on the name here (with a good summary of Royal Skousen on the issue) and another idea [...]