http://adventures-in-mormonism.com/2007/11/09/what-the-book-of-mormon-actually-says/ Correcting the incorrigible Tue, 31 Jan 2012 18:58:18 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 http://adventures-in-mormonism.com/2007/11/09/what-the-book-of-mormon-actually-says/comment-page-1/#comment-44 Adventures in Mormonism » Blog Archive » Some quotes on Native American ancestry Tue, 18 Mar 2008 14:40:50 +0000 http://adventures-in-mormonism.com/?p=56#comment-44 [...] but unanimous in claiming Native Americans all descended from Book of Mormon peoples. I’ve previously cited from Hugh Nibley’s writings in the Improvement Era (the Church’s official [...] [...] but unanimous in claiming Native Americans all descended from Book of Mormon peoples. I’ve previously cited from Hugh Nibley’s writings in the Improvement Era (the Church’s official [...]

]]> http://adventures-in-mormonism.com/2007/11/09/what-the-book-of-mormon-actually-says/comment-page-1/#comment-43 Adventures in Mormonism » Blog Archive » What the Book of Mormon actually says (part II) Fri, 16 Nov 2007 00:48:13 +0000 http://adventures-in-mormonism.com/?p=56#comment-43 [...] across the following quote from 1952 and thought it relevant to the flap over the change to the (non-canonical) introduction printed with the Book of Mormon starting in 1981: “The first rule of historical criticism in [...] [...] across the following quote from 1952 and thought it relevant to the flap over the change to the (non-canonical) introduction printed with the Book of Mormon starting in 1981: “The first rule of historical criticism in [...]

]]>