Comments on: Rethinking the Flood from an LDS perspective

By: Adventures in Mormonism » Blog Archive » The Flood revisited

Adventures in Mormonism » Blog Archive » The Flood revisited — Tue, 01 Sep 2009 00:52:36 +0000

[...] on November 7, 2007 Posted under Humor, LDS Doctrine, Main, MediaA while back, I wrote a post on rethinking the Noachian flood from an LDS perspective, with a link to a recent article by two LDS scientists raising issues with the classic Flood [...]

By: Adventures in Mormonism » Blog Archive » The Book of Mormon REPO postings: an introduction

Mon, 20 Oct 2008 01:23:17 +0000

[...] something unique in the scriptural canon: God’s dealings over a few thousand years with a post-deluvian, pre-Abrahamic (and pre-Melchizedek) people. Third, we (as members and even as LDS scholars) [...]

By: Mormon Mentality - Thoughts and Asides by Peculiar People » Revisioning the Millennium

Sat, 12 Apr 2008 20:47:21 +0000

[...] Church inherited much of the conventional conservative Christian scriptural interpretation (e.g., the ‘4004 BC’ chronology), rejecting portions only as specific revelations made it clear to do so. As part of that, we [...]

By: Adventures in Mormonism » Blog Archive » Churches of anticipation (pt. 2): baptism [revised]

Wed, 19 Mar 2008 08:29:41 +0000

[...] In the last three instances above (Alma1, John, Joseph), baptism appears to be introduced — or adapted — specifically in preparation of the advent of the Savior, either during His mortal ministry or for his Second Coming. Furthermore, I think that Enoch’s call by the Lord to preach repentance and baptism is in anticipation of the great winnowing that will result in (a) the establishment and translation of the city of Enoch, (b) the on-going translation of those who accepted the Gospel after the city of Enoch was taken from the earth (cf. Moses 7:27), and (c) the purging of the wicked from the earth (the Flood). [...]

By: Personal evolutionary development on Evolution « Banner, Sword, and Shield

Personal evolutionary development on Evolution « Banner, Sword, and Shield — Sat, 15 Mar 2008 14:18:21 +0000

[...] again see my position as a little clearer. Then reading this blog suggestion on the origins of a limited flood theory, American Style, I am more self assured in my opinion. I think I can accept Evolution and still feel just [...]

By: Adventures in Mormonism » Blog Archive » Rethinking the Flood, part III

Thu, 13 Dec 2007 03:21:11 +0000

[...] 12, 2007 Posted under LDS Doctrine, Main, ScienceI had an earlier posting that talked about rethinking the Noachian flood from an LDS perspective, changing the timeframe and location of the Noachian events to North America at the end of the last [...]

By: Elachi7

Elachi7 — Wed, 12 Sep 2007 01:39:56 +0000

There is very good reason to suspect that Adam appears around 10-14 thousand years ago. There is a sudden explosion of technology in the world that has never ceased since then. Agriculture, herding animals, working metal, working stone and wood and more.

Before then we have 35,000 years to change the way flint is worked and then another 35,000 years to the next improvement, the “battle axe people” who actually used “hand axes” which turn out to be that they hit things with rocks they held in their hands.

Interesting, isn’t it.