<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Top 10 Reasons Why Mormons Should Vote for Mitt Romney</title>
	<atom:link href="http://adventures-in-mormonism.com/2007/06/06/top-10-reasons-why-mormons-should-vote-for-mitt-romney/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://adventures-in-mormonism.com/2007/06/06/top-10-reasons-why-mormons-should-vote-for-mitt-romney/</link>
	<description>Correcting the incorrigible</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 18:58:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: bfwebster</title>
		<link>http://adventures-in-mormonism.com/2007/06/06/top-10-reasons-why-mormons-should-vote-for-mitt-romney/comment-page-1/#comment-27</link>
		<dc:creator>bfwebster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Jun 2007 02:28:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://adventures-in-mormonism.com/?p=27#comment-27</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;To quote again from Orson Scott Card (&lt;i&gt;Saintspeak&lt;/i&gt;):&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;radical&lt;/strong&gt; - Before the presidency of Heber J. Grant, what all Mormons were perceived by nonmembers to be. After all, they practiced polygamy, despised capitalism, insisted on equal rights for women under the law, and believed that the government had no right to interfere with people&#039;s private sexual practices.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;conservative&lt;/strong&gt; - After the presidency of Heber J. Grant, what all Mormons were perceived by nonmembers to be. (See &lt;b&gt;radical&lt;/b&gt;.)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

By the way, everyone else be sure to check out Guy&#039;s excellent blog, &lt;a href=&quot;http://messengerandadvocate.wordpress.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Messenger and Advocate&lt;/a&gt;. ..bruce..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To quote again from Orson Scott Card (<i>Saintspeak</i>):</p>
<blockquote><p><strong>radical</strong> &#8211; Before the presidency of Heber J. Grant, what all Mormons were perceived by nonmembers to be. After all, they practiced polygamy, despised capitalism, insisted on equal rights for women under the law, and believed that the government had no right to interfere with people&#8217;s private sexual practices.</p>
</blockquote>
<blockquote><p><strong>conservative</strong> &#8211; After the presidency of Heber J. Grant, what all Mormons were perceived by nonmembers to be. (See <b>radical</b>.)</p>
</blockquote>
<p>By the way, everyone else be sure to check out Guy&#8217;s excellent blog, <a href="http://messengerandadvocate.wordpress.com/" rel="nofollow">Messenger and Advocate</a>. ..bruce..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Guy Murray</title>
		<link>http://adventures-in-mormonism.com/2007/06/06/top-10-reasons-why-mormons-should-vote-for-mitt-romney/comment-page-1/#comment-28</link>
		<dc:creator>Guy Murray</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jun 2007 13:14:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://adventures-in-mormonism.com/?p=27#comment-28</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;[Giuliani is still my candidate, though Fred Thompson looks pretty good, too.  ..bruce..]&lt;/blockquote&gt;

But hardly the &quot;radical&quot; type of candidates of the early Church, i.e., Joseph Smith.  I think you&#039;ll have to go to the other side of the spectrum for ones closer to that style, as discussed by Bushman in the article you cited to in your Mormonism and Democracy post.  Still the Mitt reasons were pretty funny actually.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>[Giuliani is still my candidate, though Fred Thompson looks pretty good, too.  ..bruce..]</p></blockquote>
<p>But hardly the &#8220;radical&#8221; type of candidates of the early Church, i.e., Joseph Smith.  I think you&#8217;ll have to go to the other side of the spectrum for ones closer to that style, as discussed by Bushman in the article you cited to in your Mormonism and Democracy post.  Still the Mitt reasons were pretty funny actually.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

